<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Big Run on Michael Jackson’s Discography P2P Downloads</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.ipoque.com/2009/08/run-on-michael-jacksons-discography-downloads/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.ipoque.com/2009/08/run-on-michael-jacksons-discography-downloads/</link>
	<description>Do you really know your network?</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 01:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: frank</title>
		<link>http://blog.ipoque.com/2009/08/run-on-michael-jacksons-discography-downloads/#comment-13788</link>
		<dc:creator>frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 07:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ipoque.com/?p=311#comment-13788</guid>
		<description>Dear Maja

I've read different classifications of P2P file sharers regarding their motives in scientific articles. From my point of view the most relevant system consists of:
- (rough) collectors, who download as much as possible as fast as possible (preferably only at one time), mostly extensive collections of albums, movies or TV series;
- hunters, who are looking for rare, special or sold out editions, mostly real fans of an artist trying to get the "last piece";
- explorers, who are browsing the Net for new and unknown artists, often just the step before buying the CDs, DVDs, or books.

The huge amount of traffic I described in the blog was caused by the first type, by collectors downloading as much Michael Jackson music as possible at one time - attracted by the media hype after his death. The other downloaders (the non-red lines) were mostly hunters, looking for special editions of a certain album.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Maja</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve read different classifications of P2P file sharers regarding their motives in scientific articles. From my point of view the most relevant system consists of:<br />
- (rough) collectors, who download as much as possible as fast as possible (preferably only at one time), mostly extensive collections of albums, movies or TV series;<br />
- hunters, who are looking for rare, special or sold out editions, mostly real fans of an artist trying to get the &#8220;last piece&#8221;;<br />
- explorers, who are browsing the Net for new and unknown artists, often just the step before buying the CDs, DVDs, or books.</p>
<p>The huge amount of traffic I described in the blog was caused by the first type, by collectors downloading as much Michael Jackson music as possible at one time - attracted by the media hype after his death. The other downloaders (the non-red lines) were mostly hunters, looking for special editions of a certain album.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maja</title>
		<link>http://blog.ipoque.com/2009/08/run-on-michael-jacksons-discography-downloads/#comment-13775</link>
		<dc:creator>Maja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 18:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ipoque.com/?p=311#comment-13775</guid>
		<description>Dear Frank,

Thanks for the interesting article.

I am slightly confused by your last sentence: "This is a good example of different motives of downloaders." Different motives? I have spotted one motive only - "just to have it". If you can call it a motive at all. To me it seems like an unmotivated activity caused by an incidence. Did I miss some facts?

Could you share the other motives with me?!

Looking forward to your reply, Maja</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Frank,</p>
<p>Thanks for the interesting article.</p>
<p>I am slightly confused by your last sentence: &#8220;This is a good example of different motives of downloaders.&#8221; Different motives? I have spotted one motive only - &#8220;just to have it&#8221;. If you can call it a motive at all. To me it seems like an unmotivated activity caused by an incidence. Did I miss some facts?</p>
<p>Could you share the other motives with me?!</p>
<p>Looking forward to your reply, Maja</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
